On 05/24/13 04:02, li guang wrote: > 在 2013-05-24五的 10:24 +0900,Isaku Yamahata写道: >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:37:41PM +0800, li guang wrote: >>> 在 2013-05-22三的 14:28 +0900,Isaku Yamahata写道: >>>> Why? >>>> And it breaks pointer operation like >>> >>> the fact is I can't guess why gpe->sts is defined uint8_t >>> but the real hardware is 32-bit width. >> >> Which section of ACPI spec? > > seems ACPI SPEC does not define the length, > but, real hardware does, e.g. ICH9.
Still fail to see what exactly you are trying to fix. qemu can continue work with uint8_t internally just fine. memory api will split dword access by guests into 4 byte accesses. ich9_gpe_ops looks correct. >>> I expand it to 32 because the future usage for me will >>> access bit beyond 8. gpe->sts is an array, so you already have more than 8 bits. >> I don't have strong opinion wheter uint8_t or uint32_t. >> But the current patch is broken as the pointer offset >> operation needs to be fixed. Oh, and it breaks live migration too. cheers, Gerd