Il 25/05/2013 03:21, Bandan Das ha scritto: > There is one user-visible effect: "-cpu ...,enforce" will stop failing > because of missing KVM support for CPUID_EXT_MONITOR. But that's exactly > the point: there's no point in having CPU model definitions that would > never work as-is with neither TCG or KVM. This patch is changing the > meaning of (e.g.) "-machine ...,accel=kvm -cpu Opteron_G3" to match what > was already happening in practice.
But then -cpu Opteron_G3 does not match a "real" Opteron G3. Is it worth it? Paolo
