Am 23.05.2013 14:50, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 23 May 2013 13:37, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> If Big Endian targets are not yet supported, should this rather be an >> RFC? Or is that just about some unimplemented opcodes? > > I'm happy for us to wait until an actual big-endian system > running Linux appears before we worry about it. #error if anybody > tries it is perfectly fine. (I would be surprised if we got > it right for the 32 bit bigendian hosts, for that matter: > there simply aren't really any systems out there running > big-endian Linux ARM which you could test it on.)
I was worried about Big Endian QEMU targets (ppc, sparc, etc.), not about Big Endian ARM hosts. If only half our targets are supported by a TCG backend, then the default target list is busted, whether hardcoded or default-configs-generated. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
