On 06.05.2013, at 20:13, Torbjorn Granlund wrote: > Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> writes: > > Thanks a lot for the bug report and test case! Please CC qemu-ppc > whenever you find issues or have patches for PPC. That makes filtering > for important mails a lot easier. > > Would that make my complaints be considered more or less important? :-) > > Does the patch below fix the issue for you? > > It indeed does. (I actually tried that already, but I cannot follow the > data flow into these functions, so cannot tell if that patch is > sufficient.
Yes, it is. It's a leftover bug from converting the code to TCG I assume. > This bug indicates complete non-testing status of these > insns, which are mainstream enough to be generated by gcc. I suppose > there will likely be more such fundamental errors if more instructions > are also completely untested.) There's a certain chance that happens, yes. We don't have instruction test suites for the PPC target. Alex
