On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:40:54 -0500 Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > Yeah, I agree. > > > > When testing migration, for example, I have to type 'migrate -d tcp:0:4444' > > several times... Maybe there's a smarter way to do this, but the monitor > > macros idea seems interesting to me. > > > > When we have QMP, we can create a QMP socket at a well known location > based on the -name parameter. We could also introduce a qm command that > allowed one to execute monitor commands from the shell. That allows > people to write whatever crazy shell scripts they want. Yes. What about the macros idea? Are you against it?
