On 4 May 2013 09:27, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 04.05.2013 10:22, schrieb Jean-Christophe DUBOIS: >> Do you mean arm_load_kernel() should test for qtest_enable() or should I >> call arm_load_kernel() only if !qtest_enable() (there is not much >> platform checking for qtest_enable() at this time and it seems somebody >> need to set the "entry" field in the info struct). > > In short, qtest does not execute any code, so it does not need to load > binaries or set CPU entry addresses. > > Yes, I would say there is no point calling arm_load_kernel() if > !qtest_enabled().
I'd rather we didn't end up with qtest_enabled() checks infecting every board model, please... thanks -- PMM
