于 2013-4-30 3:05, Luiz Capitulino 写道:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:46:57 +0200
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 05:31:15PM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
@@ -2586,10 +2585,12 @@ void do_info_snapshots(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
      }

      if (total > 0) {
-        monitor_printf(mon, "%s\n", bdrv_snapshot_dump(buf, sizeof(buf), 
NULL));
+        bdrv_snapshot_dump(NULL);
+        monitor_printf(mon, "\n");

Luiz: any issue with mixing monitor_printf(mon) and
monitor_vprintf(cur_mon) calls?  I guess there was a reason for
explicitly passing mon instead of relying on cur_mon.

where are they being mixed?

  bdrv_snapshot_dump() used a global variable "cur_mon" inside, instead
of let caller pass in a explicit montior* "mon", I guess that is the
question.

--
Best Regards

Wenchao Xia


Reply via email to