Il 30/04/2013 14:16, Andreas Färber ha scritto: > > The patch version committed has an additional change in this file: > > @@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ static void pc_init1(MemoryRegion *system_memory, > void *fw_cfg = NULL; > > pc_cpus_init(cpu_model); > - pc_acpi_init("acpi-dsdt.aml"); > > if (kvmclock_enabled) { > kvmclock_create(); > > Was that accidental? Noticed because of a conflict with Igor's patches.
Yes, it must have been introduced when applying, because this wasn't a pull request. I'll send a patch to revert. > Further, my Reviewed-by is missing on patch 1/8, so was maybe the > previous RFC version committed accidentally instead of this one? No, the RFC only had 6 patches and patches 6-7-8 were completely different (and broken). Paolo