Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > Il 25/04/2013 14:26, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: >> That's a good point, although I wonder if a command could have a new >> capability that's not mapped to a new argument. IOW, I'd expect most/all >> new capabilities to always be mapped to new arguments. > > A new enum value would also be a new capability, but it's handled better > by enabling introspection of enum values.
An extension that adds neither arguments nor argument values is probably an incompatible change, not a proper extension. Don't do that then.