Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:

> Il 25/04/2013 14:26, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
>> That's a good point, although I wonder if a command could have a new
>> capability that's not mapped to a new argument. IOW, I'd expect most/all
>> new capabilities to always be mapped to new arguments.
>
> A new enum value would also be a new capability, but it's handled better
> by enabling introspection of enum values.

An extension that adds neither arguments nor argument values is probably
an incompatible change, not a proper extension.  Don't do that then.

Reply via email to