在 2013-04-24三的 08:05 +0100，Peter Maydell写道：
> On 24 April 2013 02:48, liguang <lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> I'm afraid this is definitely wrong. It has a less than
> helpful name, but cs_base is actually just "another 32/64 bits
> of state that the target can use to distinguish translation
> blocks", and some non-x86 targets do use it. For instance:
only sparc use it as a tmp buffer for pc.
>
>
> > --- a/target-sparc/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target-sparc/cpu.h
> > @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ trap_state* cpu_tsptr(CPUSPARCState* env);
> > #define TB_FLAG_AM_ENABLED (1 << 5)
> >
> > static inline void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUSPARCState *env, target_ulong
> > *pc,
> > - target_ulong *cs_base, int *flags)
> > + int *flags)
> > {
> > *pc = env->pc;
> > *cs_base = env->npc;
>
> ...surely this doesn't even compile after your changes?
>
seems no problem for me.
> thanks
> -- PMM
