On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 05:18:08PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:25:37 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Break lines so they don't get too long once the *_features fields are
> > replaced by an array.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > target-i386/cpu.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
> > index 732cafd..5390ca5 100644
> > --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
> > @@ -918,8 +918,10 @@ static void kvm_cpu_fill_host(x86_def_t *x86_cpu_def)
> > x86_cpu_def->stepping = eax & 0x0F;
> >
> > x86_cpu_def->level = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x0, 0, R_EAX);
> > - x86_cpu_def->features = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x1, 0, R_EDX);
> > - x86_cpu_def->ext_features = kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x1, 0,
> > R_ECX);
> > + x86_cpu_def->features =
> > + kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x1, 0, R_EDX);
> > + x86_cpu_def->ext_features =
> > + kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x1, 0, R_ECX);
> >
> > if (x86_cpu_def->level >= 7) {
> > x86_cpu_def->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features =
>
> Reviewed 4-6/7 patches, they look good, I'd though would merge them since
> they are doing the same repetitive thing and easy to review.
Thanks! I sent them as separate patches so they could be discussed and
cherry-picked individually if necessary, but I really don't mind merging
all of them. My previous version of this series even included everything
(patches 1-7) as a single patch. :-)
Andreas, how should we proceed?
--
Eduardo
