On 10/19/2009 12:40 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
'could not open device: permission denied' 'could not open device:
no such file or directory' 'could not open device: device or
resource busy'
Which makes me wonder whenever it makes sense to re-use errno for the
error codes instead of inventing our own QERR_* codes?
The errno would be just one field in the error. You'd have
QERR_COULD_NOT_OPEN with a string field EACCES/ENOENT/EBUSY/Ewhatever.
Not the numbers of course because they are not standardized as far I
know, but the Ename strings.
No, numbers are not standardized.
Paolo