Il 11/04/2013 16:06, Michael R. Hines ha scritto: >>> >> My understanding is the issue is protocol compatibility, >> not optimization. E.g. you can migrate to file, for each >> new feature you need a way to disable it to stay compatible. > > Ok, understood. > > I would be happy to add a check for the other migration URI > protocols (like 'unix', 'tcp', etc) which says rejects disabling > the zero page checking only if the URI is for rdma. > > Would that be OK?
I would like to see is_dup_page() on top of a "perf" profile for a real-world scenario, and throughput numbers for the same real-world scenario with/without is_dup_page(). Once you show that, yes. Paolo
