On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:33:56 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 05/04/2013 16:37, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
> > + const char *ioapic_name = "ioapic";
> >
> > if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> > - dev = qdev_create(NULL, "kvm-ioapic");
> > - } else {
> > - dev = qdev_create(NULL, "ioapic");
> > - }
> > - if (parent_name) {
> > - object_property_add_child(object_resolve_path(parent_name, NULL),
> > - "ioapic", OBJECT(dev), NULL);
> > + ioapic_name = "kvm-ioapic";
> > }
> > - qdev_init_nofail(dev);
> > - d = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev);
> > - sysbus_mmio_map(d, 0, IO_APIC_DEFAULT_ADDRESS);
> > + object_property_set_str(OBJECT(dev), ioapic_name, "ioapic-type",
> > NULL);
>
> Why do you need this?
>
> Having the IOAPIC as a QOM child of the icc-bridge is not too important,
> I think. Perhaps not even too correct...
icc-bridge provides address space for IOAPIC, so it looked like a right thing
to make sure that destruction order would be IOAPIC first and only then parent
icc-bridge.
This patch is not really necessary for hot-plug, we could easily drop it, if
you prefer.
BTW:
looks like this pre-reordering patch slipped in
Correct one is "[PATCH 19/22] target-i386: move IOAPIC to ICC bus"
>
> Paolo
>
