Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > The same QEMUFile is never used for both read and write. Simplify > the logic to simply look for presence or absence of the right ops. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Love this one. > @@ -556,11 +557,7 @@ static void qemu_fill_buffer(QEMUFile *f) > int len; > int pending; > > - if (!f->ops->get_buffer) > - return; Why are we removing this test? this has nothing to do with the is_write removal? And yes, having a better way of knowing that the operations are there looks like a good idea, but that is independent of this series. Thanks, Juan.
