Hi Edgar,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias
<edgar.igles...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:09:16PM +1000, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> Some dodgy casts were making a mess of these msgs.
>
>
> Hi Peter
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com>
>> ---
>>
>> hw/m25p80.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/m25p80.c b/hw/m25p80.c
>> index 55e9d0d..34b476b 100644
>> --- a/hw/m25p80.c
>> +++ b/hw/m25p80.c
>> @@ -538,15 +538,15 @@ static uint32_t m25p80_transfer8(SSISlave *ss,
>> uint32_t tx)
>> switch (s->state) {
>>
>> case STATE_PAGE_PROGRAM:
>> - DB_PRINT("page program cur_addr=%lx data=%x\n", s->cur_addr,
>> - (uint8_t)tx);
>> + DB_PRINT("page program cur_addr=%lx data=%x\n",
>> (unsigned)s->cur_addr,
>
> Shouldn't this be using PRIx64 for cur_addr?
>
Yes, fixed in v2. Also used PRIx8 for the uint8_ts around the place.
Regards,
Peter
>
>> + (unsigned)(uint8_t)tx);
>> flash_write8(s, s->cur_addr, (uint8_t)tx);
>> s->cur_addr++;
>> break;
>>
>> case STATE_READ:
>> r = s->storage[s->cur_addr];
>> - DB_PRINT("READ 0x%lx=%x\n", s->cur_addr, r);
>> + DB_PRINT("READ 0x%lx=%x\n", (unsigned)s->cur_addr, (unsigned)r);
>
>
> same here.
>
>
>> s->cur_addr = (s->cur_addr + 1) % s->size;
>> break;
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
>>
>>
>
