Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:37:52PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > There are several places where QEMU accidentally relies on the
>> > O_NONBLOCK state
>> > of passed file descriptors. Exposing O_NONBLOCK state makes it
>> > part of the QMP
>>
>> If in future, we push more backend on their dedicated thread, will the
>> related fd be block?
>
> This series is not related to threading in QEMU. The convention it
> establishes is that passed fds are blocking. If QEMU wants to use
^^^^^^^^
You mean here non-blocking
> nonblocking it must call qemu_set_block(fd). This works whether it is
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
or here qemu_set_nonblock(fd)
no?
I guess the second one O:-)
Later, Juan.
> done from a traditional QEMU thread or a data plane thread.
>
> Stefan
