> How would that be different in your patch? But you can solve it by > making two >= loops, one checking for 4*BITS_PER_LONG and one checking > BITS_PER_LONG.
This is what I have now: diff --git a/util/bitops.c b/util/bitops.c index e72237a..b0dc93f 100644 --- a/util/bitops.c +++ b/util/bitops.c @@ -24,12 +24,13 @@ unsigned long find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size, const unsigned long *p = addr + BITOP_WORD(offset); unsigned long result = offset & ~(BITS_PER_LONG-1); unsigned long tmp; + unsigned long d0,d1,d2,d3; if (offset >= size) { return size; } size -= result; - offset %= BITS_PER_LONG; + offset &= (BITS_PER_LONG-1); if (offset) { tmp = *(p++); tmp &= (~0UL << offset); @@ -42,7 +43,19 @@ unsigned long find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size, size -= BITS_PER_LONG; result += BITS_PER_LONG; } - while (size & ~(BITS_PER_LONG-1)) { + while (size >= 4*BITS_PER_LONG) { + d0 = *p; + d1 = *(p+1); + d2 = *(p+2); + d3 = *(p+3); + if (d0 || d1 || d2 || d3) { + break; + } + p+=4; + result += 4*BITS_PER_LONG; + size -= 4*BITS_PER_LONG; + } + while (size >= BITS_PER_LONG) { if ((tmp = *(p++))) { goto found_middle; }