On 03/07/13 00:15, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 02:59 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> qga/commands-posix.c | 146
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>
>> @@ -1027,6 +1031,136 @@ error:
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> +#define SYSCONF_EXACT(name, err) sysconf_exact((name), #name, (err))
>
> Technically, the inner () are redundant (in a parameter list, there is
> no syntax that can be rendered differently if you called
> sysconf_exact(name, #name, err)); but I don't mind keeping them for
> style purposes (the rule of thumb of parenthesizing macro parameters for
> safety is a bit easier to remember if you always do it, even when it is
> redundant).
You're correct, of course. I was thinking of the comma operator within
the macro argument, but one has to parenthesize that even for the macro
invocation, and then those parens will show up in the replacement text
as well. For example, the following works:
#define X(a, b) y(a, b)
static void
y(int p, int q)
{
}
int
main(void)
{
int t;
X((t=1, 2), 3);
return 0;
}
>> + vcpu->has_can_offline = true; /* lolspeak ftw */
>
> Indeed :)
I was hoping you'd appreciate it :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Thanks!
Laszlo
