On 03/05/13 11:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 05/03/2013 00:22, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >>> Yes, the right thing to do would be to QOMify memory regions and >>> introduce pins, but that's a bit more than the amount of time I have now >>> for this. >> >> ...plus it means that when we do have these things we >> have to go round and identify the cases where no_user >> was set only because we didn't have the features before. > > Yes, that's why my patch includes a comment to this end. > >> My attitude here really is "yes, it's not great but it's >> been like this forever and we don't seem to have had a >> huge flood of user complaints, so better not to mess >> with it unless what you're doing is going to amount to >> some kind of cleanup". > > I did find a complaint from a Red Hat tester about having the sysbus > EHCI device in the help. I guess an alternative fix will be to move > those device to a separate CONFIG_ symbol.
Or just exclude any sysbus device? Or will that kill too much? cheers, Gerd
