Andreas Schwab, le Tue 05 Feb 2008 11:32:30 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Mmm, actually, shouldn't qemu use a more "private" network like a > > RFC1918 172.16.0.0/12 network? > > In which way is 172.16.0.0/12 more "private" than 10.0.0.0/8?
Precisely thanks to the reservation page I mentioned. Samuel
