Cleanup patch is ok with me.
Acked-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@gmail.com>
---
Sent from my phone
On Feb 15, 2013 12:24 AM, "Andreas Färber" <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>
> Am 14.02.2013 22:42, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
wrote:
> >> Am 27.01.2013 14:32, schrieb Andreas Färber:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
> >>> ---
> >>> target-sparc/ldst_helper.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 Datei geändert, 1 Zeile hinzugefügt(+), 1 Zeile entfernt(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/target-sparc/ldst_helper.c b/target-sparc/ldst_helper.c
> >>> index cf1bddf..7decd66 100644
> >>> --- a/target-sparc/ldst_helper.c
> >>> +++ b/target-sparc/ldst_helper.c
> >>> @@ -1850,7 +1850,7 @@ void helper_st_asi(CPUSPARCState *env,
target_ulong addr, target_ulong val,
> >>> DPRINTF_MMU("LSU change: 0x%" PRIx64 " -> 0x%"
PRIx64 "\n",
> >>> oldreg, env->lsu);
> >>> #ifdef DEBUG_MMU
> >>> - dump_mmu(stdout, fprintf, env1);
> >>> + dump_mmu(stdout, fprintf, env);
> >>> #endif
> >>> tlb_flush(env, 1);
> >>> }
> >>
> >> This patch was not applied to master. Was that an oversight or is
> >> something wrong with it? (Preparing a v2 series for 1.5.)
> >
> > Wasn't this a part of RFC series? What happened with the rest of the 19?
>
> This is a standalone bugfix, originally intended for 1.4 as indicated by
> the subject.
>
> cris, ppc and s390x bugfixes were applied through the maintainers during
> Soft Freeze.
>
> The cris Coding Style cleanup is still pending, no feedback from Edgar
> on whether it is okay or not yet (already 3x on the list).
>
> The actual RFC patches based on those are being redone similar to the
> tmp105 v3 patch I ping'ed, based on suggestions from Anthony and Alex.
> I inserted a patch to add qemu_log_mask_vprintf() as prerequisite.
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
