On 2013-02-04 10:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
- } + /* Both this function and the gcc builtin are undefined at 0, whereas + the host-utils functions return word-size at 0. Thus we prefer the + gcc builtin as the closer match. */I think we should just fix the inconsistency rather than retaining several similarly-named functions which have differing corner-case behaviour.
As opposed to bitops_ctzl (-1) and host-utils ctzN (N) ? r~
