Am 29.01.2013 15:04, schrieb Juan Quintela: > Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Prompted by earlier patches from Juan, this series cleans up some targets >> that don't implement migration - be it by no-op implementations, by erroring >> out in the implementation or by lack of implementation. > > Agreed with this. At least we move the problem in the right direction. > > Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
Thanks. Christian and Richard had no objections for s390x, nor did anyone else, so applying this to qom-cpu: https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-cpu On qom-cpu-next m68k, s390x and unicore32 had slight conflicts due to introduction of DeviceClass / dc->vmsd in class_init. Rebased: https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-cpu-next Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
