Am 31.01.2013 16:49, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 04:08:44PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Prepares for cpu_interrupt() changing argument to CPUState.
>>
>> While touching it, rename to x86_cpu_...() now that it takes an X86CPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> 
> Why the "for-1.4?"?

I'm suggesting it for 1.4 as a non-intrusive cleanup, for Igor and you
to rebase property etc. work on to avoid merge conflicts (being my sole
such i386-only patch currently). If there are any concerns, I can put it
into qom-cpu-next instead (where the cpu_init changes are queued).

> Is there a for-1.4 bug fix that depends on this?

No, it is not strictly needed, I'm just flushing my queue of preparatory
patches to get my upcoming qom-cpu-8 patchset shorter - I probably need
to split off a qom-cpu-9 though.

Andreas

>> ---
>>  Extracted from my qom-cpu-8 queue.
[snip]

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

Reply via email to