Am 29.01.2013 12:03, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 27 January 2013 16:30, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> In the initial conversion of CPU models to QOM types, model names were >> mapped 1:1 to type names. As a side effect this gained us a type "any", >> which is now a device. >> >> To avoid "-device any" silliness and to pave the way for compiling >> multiple targets into one executable, adopt a <name>-<arch>-cpu scheme. >> This leads to names like arm926-arm-cpu but is easiest to handle. >> >> No functional changes for -cpu arguments or -cpu ? output. >> >> Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> > > Acked-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
I just re-reviewed this: env->cpu_model_str is set in cpu_arm_init(), so this patch is good to go (unlike unicore32). > I assume you're going to submit this via the qom subtree. It applies to master now and is an arm-internal leaf patch. Since you have another target-arm.next patch that Blue didn't pick up so far, feel free to send a pull for both. But I'm fine taking it through my tree if you prefer. Thanks, Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
