Hi, Am 29.01.2013 07:42, schrieb Kuo-Jung Su: > Thanks for reminding me of the usb_ehci_pci_initfn. > > But I have a stupid question....... > > Which one do the upcoming path v2 looks like ? > > 1. It contains only the diff to usb_ehci_pci_initfn, for example: > > [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 0/1] usb-ehci: add Faraday FUSBH200 support > [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 1/1] usb-ehci: update usb_ehci_pci_initfn to > use variable version of portsc > > 2. It contains the entired change logs, for example: > > [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 0/3] usb-ehci: add Faraday FUSBH200 support > [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 1/3] usb-ehci: replace PORTSC macros with > variables .. > [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 2/3] usb-ehci: add Faraday FUSBH200 support > [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 3/3] usb-ehci: update usb_ehci_pci_initfn ...
Neither. You should send a v2 consisting of two patches, with 1/2 containing the requested fix, so that at no point in your patch series anything breaks. Regards, Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg