Hi,

Am 29.01.2013 07:42, schrieb Kuo-Jung Su:
> Thanks for reminding me of the usb_ehci_pci_initfn.
> 
> But I have a stupid question.......
> 
> Which one do the upcoming path v2 looks like ?
> 
> 1. It contains only the diff to usb_ehci_pci_initfn, for example:
> 
>     [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 0/1] usb-ehci: add Faraday FUSBH200 support
>     [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 1/1] usb-ehci: update usb_ehci_pci_initfn to
> use variable version of portsc
> 
> 2. It contains the entired change logs, for example:
> 
>     [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 0/3] usb-ehci: add Faraday FUSBH200 support
>     [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 1/3] usb-ehci: replace PORTSC macros with
> variables ..
>     [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 2/3] usb-ehci: add Faraday FUSBH200 support
>     [Qemu-devel][PATCH v2 3/3] usb-ehci: update usb_ehci_pci_initfn ...

Neither. You should send a v2 consisting of two patches, with 1/2
containing the requested fix, so that at no point in your patch series
anything breaks.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

Reply via email to