> Am 18.01.2013 17:22, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > I haven't written a testcase for it, it's tricky but should be > > doable. > > Do you want me to respin, or can it be done as a followup? > > I think I would prefer a respin, but if you think otherwise, I won't > insist.
Okay, I'll respin. I'll just note that this series now is in danger of missing 1.4 (after 1.2 and 1.3) because only Laszlo and Eric gave it a decent review in the six months since it was first posted. Had I been employed by any other company, I'd probably just have kept the code in house and forgotten about upstream. > Also, wouldn't we backport the fixed version in the first place so that > a pointer isn't even needed? This code doesn't seem to exist yet in > RHEL 6. Oops, you're right. We fixed the problem in a different way. Paolo
