Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> writes: > Hi Anthony, > > Am 16.01.2013 00:02, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> >> Please adjust your pull request script to include a 0/M marker if you're >> also including patches in the reply. > > In the past it was you who specifically requested us to always include > the queue of patches part of that pull as reply! Is this no longer > desired?
Yes, it is. My patches tool handles PULL requests without them fine but for QEMU, I want pull requests to include the patches being pulled. If you're including patches (and you should), then the first mail should indicate that it's the 0th mail of the series. > Or how would I generate 0/M from my bash script? git-request-pull > doesn't really fit into the "blurb" of a regular cover letter, coming > with its own stats, so that I generate the mail headers by script. I don't send pull requests so I'm the wrong person to ask. Peter/Stefan, how do ya'll do it? Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Regards, > Andreas > >> No worries about this request, but my new version tracker gets confused >> because it marks this whole series as "broken" because it's impossible >> for a non-human to tell if this is the cover letter or something silly >> like a new top-level patch posted to this thread. >> >> Regards, >> >> Anthony Liguori > > -- > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
