Il 10/01/2013 10:10, Gerd Hoffmann ha scritto: > >> > Do we need the complexity of supporting fd passing explicitly? >> > 'getfd' is less than ideal compared to 'add-fd', and for 'add-fd', >> > we would pass via "path":"/dev/fdset/nnn". That is, why do we need >> > to bend over backwards to support an alternate syntax for fd >> > passing in a new command, when we can already use existing commands >> > to get fd passing for free? > Oh, didn't know that. Was just following what SocketAddress does and > what Paolo suggested. It isn't needed indeed.
Yeah, I hadn't followed fdset either. We really need more documentation. Paolo
