On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:50:44PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:51:04PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > >> > >> > I guess you are saying we want to add bus= option to -net nic? > >> > >> I absolutely wouldn't object to that. > >> > >> But I can think of better solutions too. Like: > >> > >> -virtio-net ... > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Anthony Liguori > > > > for most people I think virtio is an implementation detail really. no? > > So what is it that people really want to do?
With virtio? They want to install a driver and have networking go faster. > Is tap an implementation detail? Should we just do -nics 4 and call it > a day? I'm not being facetious, I really think we should approach it > like this. How would you make it work well? > We don't need to design our internal interfaces/abstractions such that > they map 1-1 with command line arguments meant for normal users. Of course. > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > -- > >> >> >> > MST
