"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:40:13PM +0100, fred.kon...@greensocs.com wrote: >> From: KONRAD Frederic <fred.kon...@greensocs.com> >> >> Here is the full series for virtio-refactoring. >> >> You can clone that from here : >> git.greensocs.com/home/greensocs/git/qemu_virtio.git virtio_refactoring >> >> virtio-mmio parts is not included but you can clone them from here : >> git.greensocs.com/home/greensocs/git/qemu_virtio.git virtio_refactoring_mmio >> >> I think that the old VirtioBindings can be fixed later as nothing use >> interface >> now and I didn't find any example in the code. >> >> Also I didn't try all the devices. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Fred > > I'd like to see this question from the previous revision answered: > Why make sane bindings like pci carry the maintainance overhead of the > artificial bus?
This question is silly. There is absolutely nothing sane about virtio-pci. This series properly models virtio. Regards, Anthony Liguori > why don't you create your own bus for mmio and put your devices there? > Allocate resources when you init a device. > > >> -- >> 1.7.11.7
