Il 21/12/2012 01:27, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> #!/bin/sh
>
> gzip -d -c lidb.ssmall.img.gz | \
> ~/build/qemu/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -cdrom \
> ~/isos/OCDC-lucid-Test-Drive-20110523_140333.iso -enable-kvm -m 2G \
> -incoming exec:dd
>
> With lidb.ssmall.img.gz being generated from a 'migrate exec:dd of=...'
> from qemu.git just a week or two ago.
So it breaks *incoming* migration, which would restrict the problem to
the beginning of the patch (reorganization of the RAM block list).
Everything else touches only outgoing migration.
However, I tested bidirectional migration between origin/master and
Juan's branch and it passed
x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \
-drive if=virtio,cache=none,file=/../images/jeos-17-64.qcow2 \
-vnc :1 -incoming "exec:cat foo" --enable-kvm
I also tested both my and Juan's branches and they both pass all
migration tests.
> I can't bisect tonight but can attempt to tomorrow. How has this been
> tested?
Indeed old->new and new->old migration wasn't tested AFAIK. Not by me
at least.
Paolo
> I'm a little concerned here about the timing. With the Christmas
> and New Years holiday we're pretty darn close to soft freeze for 1.4.
>
> Has this series gone through a full autotest run with multiple guests?
