On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:33:13PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 18.12.2012 18:03, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 05:44:12PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:29:21 -0200 > >> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > >>> --- > >>> target-i386/cpu.c | 5 +++-- > >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c > >>> index 2d4fc42..fe27def 100644 > >>> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c > >>> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c > >>> @@ -1789,10 +1789,11 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t > >>> index, uint32_t count, /* XXX: The physical address space is limited to 42 > >>> bits in exec.c. */ *eax = 0x00003028; /* 48 bits virtual, 40 bits > >> ^^ you forgot TAB here > > > > See patch 2/3. :-) > > Can I just squash that into this one?
Yes, sure. I was keeping both changes separate on my git tree while working/rebasing the series, but I should have squashed them before submitting (as both are just "coding style fixes"). -- Eduardo
