On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:14:00PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 17/12/2012 11:40, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > > How about the following? Then we can put reset > > in generic code where it belongs. > > It's untested - really kind of pseudo code - and > > s390 is still to be updated. > > > > Posting to see what does everyone thinks. > > I'm not (yet) sure how that helps my problem,
It makes it possible for virtio.c to get at the device state through the binding pointer. So you will be able to qdev_reset_all from virtio.c where it belongs, instead of duplicating code in all bindings. > but it is definitely a > step in the right direction! > > Paolo
