On 6 December 2012 15:37, Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote: > target-arm has very similar code. Isn't it better to first write a > common reusable function to list CPU models using the list of > subclasses, instead of adding very similar functions to all > architectures?
What would be particularly useful to have as a common utility routine is support for x86-style +feature,-feature syntax. At the moment we don't implement that on most other targets but it would be good to have that on ARM at some point. -- PMM
