On 12/04/12 16:57, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi Gerd, > > Am 04.12.2012 14:04, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann: >> Hi, >> >> Same patches as posted last week. No review comments, 1.4 tree >> open, so it should be ready to go in now. > > That's not quite true - you ignored my review comment wrt MemoryRegion > placement (and I left it to you to look for further instances). Can you > please fix that up on your branch or as follow-up?
You mean that empty line after parent_object? I can send a followup for that one. Why it is important btw? Just style? Some parser tool? Can we make checkpatch.pl check this? > Did you see any overlap with Julien's series or can I post my PULL in > parallel? Given that you kicked out the acpi changes due to q35 merge conflicts it should work in parallel as my series touches acpi only. Havn't actually tried to merge though. A small followup is needed once both are in: replace get_system_io() with the new isa_address_space() in the acpi code. cheers, Gerd
