Il 26/11/2012 12:52, Andreas Färber ha scritto: > Am 26.11.2012 08:20, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> Il 26/11/2012 01:12, Andreas Färber ha scritto: >>> qdev_free() was trivially wrapping object_delete(). Inline it and drop >>> the wrapper as a further step to QOM'ify qdev. >> >> The reference counts of devices and buses are completely disconnected >> from reality, and that's why object_delete() works. >> >> I'd prefer this patch not to be applied until this is straightened out... > > Your series is marked for-1.3 whereas this is for 1.4, so no obvious > problem there - wanted to mention the overlap in the cover letter but > apparently forgot.
I have a more complete series for 1.4 (needs a bit more testing, but I guess I can send out an RFC). The one I posted for 1.3 is a subset. > My quest was to kill obsolete things with old "qdev" in the name. :) > I don't really mind if this becomes object_delete() or object_unref() or > anything else as long as it's not such a trivial qdev_* wrapper calling > one QOM object_* function. Ok, that's fine. Paolo
