On 23 November 2012 15:31, Jamie Lokier <ja...@shareable.org> wrote: > x86 instruction sets haven't followed a linear progression of features > for quite a while, especially including non-Intel chips, so it stopped > making sense for GCC to indicate the instruction set in that way.
If you're going to go down that route you need to start defining #defines for features then, so we could say defined(__rdtsc__) or defined(__cmov__) and so on. I don't see any of those either :-( -- PMM
