On 23/11/2012 13:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 23 November 2012 12:29, Stefan Hajnoczi<stefa...@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:50:51PM +0100, fred.kon...@greensocs.com wrote:
+static const struct VirtioBusInfo virtio_bus_info = {
+ .init_cb = virtio_pci_init_cb,
+ .exit_cb = virtio_pci_exit_cb,
+
+ .virtio_bindings = {
Eventually VirtIOBindings can probably be inlined into VirtioBusInfo. I
don't see a need for separate structs.
I agree. It might (or might not) be convenient to retain it
temporarily while converting all the transports, but
VirtIOBindings is part of the old code which we're trying
to refactor here, and I'd expect it to go away when we're done.
-- PMM
Yes, for the moment, I didn't refactor this VirtIOBindings, so it is
better to separate struct to keep the virtiodevice binding function.
