On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:27:11AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 19.11.2012, at 23:51, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 05:34:12PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13.11.2012, at 03:47, David Gibson wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru>
> >>>
> >>> In future (with VFIO) we will have multiple PCI host bridges on
> >>> pseries. Each one needs a unique LIOBN (IOMMU id). At the moment we
> >>> derive these from the pci domain number, but the whole notion of
> >>> domain numbers on the qemu side is bogus and in any case they're not
> >>> actually uniquely allocated at this point.
> >>>
> >>> This patch, therefore uses a simple sequence counter to generate
> >>> unique LIOBNs for PCI host bridges.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru>
> >>> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> >>
> >> I don't really like the idea of having a global variable just
> >> because our domain ID generation seems to not work as
> >> expected. Michael, any comments here?
> >
> > Well, the patch I sent which changed domain id generation was
> > ignored. In any case, as I said, the whole concept of domain numbers
>
> Michael?
>
> > makes no sense on the qemu side, so I don't think increasing reliance
> > on them by using them here is a good idea.
> >
> > It would be conceptually nicer to derive the liobn from the buid, but
> > that would rely on the buid's being unique in the low 32-bits, which
> > is true in practice, but seems risky to rely on.
>
> Well, there has to be some uniqueness from the guest's POV already,
> no?
Yes, the BUIDs are unique, but they are 64-bit, whereas the LIOBN is
only 32-bit.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
