malc <av1...@comtv.ru> writes: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> malc <av1...@comtv.ru> writes: >> >> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > >> >> On 19 November 2012 18:21, malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> >> +5) Files without explicit licenses fall under the GPL v2. >> >> > >> >> > I have issue with this, files without licenses are just that files >> >> > without licenses. >> >> >> >> If we believe this (and it seems a logical thing to believe) >> >> then QEMU's not distributable until we rewrite or remove or track >> >> down all authors for all the files without licenses... >> > >> > Yes. >> >> That's ridiculous. >> >> There has always been a LICENSE file with a catch-all clause going back >> to at least 2005. >> >> If a file doesn't have an explicit LICENSE, it falls under the catch all >> clause. >> > > Wishful thinking.
I suspect the wishful thinking part is wishing you could give legal advice.
