"J. Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 21:32 +0100, andrzej zaborowski wrote: >> I think a line like >> >> #define inline __attribute__ (( always_inline )) inline >> >> in dyngen-exec.h should be > > As I already pointed it in the first message of the thread, this kind of > define would expand recursivelly, [...]
No. A macro is not expanded within its own expansion. See ISO C99: 6.10.3.4 Rescanning and further replacement [...] 2 If the name of the macro being replaced is found during this scan of the replacement list (not including the rest of the source file's preprocessing tokens), it is not replaced. If it still bothers you, you could write it as #define inline __attribute__ (( always_inline )) __inline__ since GCC accepts __inline__ as a synonym for inline. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org