On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 30 October 2012 16:40, malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > >> Add a section to HACKING describing the bits of implementation > >> defined C compiler behaviour which C code in QEMU is allowed > >> to rely on. > > > > People who will desperately do a text search for "behaviour" in > > relevant standards will soon learn that the british spelling is > > not favoured by WG14. Other than that this addition to the document > > looks fine (a link to the freely available drafts and/or wikipedia > > reference would be nice) > > This one, right?
Yes. > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf > ("Final version of the C99 standard with corrigenda TC1, TC2, and > TC3 included, formatted as a draft", to borrow wikipedia's description). > > I guess I should also say we code to C99 in particular (ie not > C89 or C11). -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
