On 22 October 2012 22:06, Cole Robinson <crobi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/07/2012 06:36 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 7 October 2012 23:27, Cole Robinson <crobi...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> #define KERNEL_ARGS_ADDR 0x100 >>> #define KERNEL_LOAD_ADDR 0x00010000 >>> -#define INITRD_LOAD_ADDR 0x00d00000 >>> +#define INITRD_LOAD_ADDR 0x01d00000 >> >> This makes me sad but I still have no idea what we could >> do that would be better than this...
> I agree it's unfortunate, but in the absence of a better solution, could this > patch be applied? This patch puts the initrd starting at 29MB (was 13MB). That would probably break any machines with 32MB memory configurations. So I need to check if there are any which might plausibly be run with 32MB (and if so maybe set initrd load address based on ram_size?) Also 13MB is an absolutely ginormous kernel... -- PMM
