On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:43:38PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
>
> Avoid passing a non-PCI IRQ to ich9_gsi_to_pirq. It's wrong and triggers
> an assertion.
>
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jba...@redhat.com>
Thanks, applied.
> ---
> hw/lpc_ich9.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/lpc_ich9.c
> index d9fd9de..a47d7a9 100644
> --- a/hw/lpc_ich9.c
> +++ b/hw/lpc_ich9.c
> @@ -264,9 +264,11 @@ static int ich9_gsi_to_pirq(int gsi)
>
> static void ich9_lpc_update_apic(ICH9LPCState *lpc, int gsi)
> {
> - int level;
> + int level = 0;
>
> - level = pci_bus_get_irq_level(lpc->d.bus, ich9_gsi_to_pirq(gsi));
> + if (gsi >= ICH9_LPC_PIC_NUM_PINS) {
> + level |= pci_bus_get_irq_level(lpc->d.bus, ich9_gsi_to_pirq(gsi));
> + }
> if (gsi == ich9_lpc_sci_irq(lpc)) {
> level |= lpc->sci_level;
> }
> --
> 1.7.1
