Rather than assert, simply return PCI_INTX_DISABLED when we don't
have a pci_route_irq_fn.  PIIX already returns DISABLED for an
invalid pin, so users already deal with this state.  Users of this
interface should only be acting on an ENABLED or INVERTED return
value (though we really have no support for INVERTED).

Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>
---

A compromise to the gridlock; defuse the assert, but don't add
a new state to the API.  Thanks,

Alex

 hw/pci.c |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
index 83d262a..9525220 100644
--- a/hw/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci.c
@@ -1094,7 +1094,11 @@ PCIINTxRoute pci_device_route_intx_to_irq(PCIDevice 
*dev, int pin)
          pin = bus->map_irq(dev, pin);
          dev = bus->parent_dev;
     } while (dev);
-    assert(bus->route_intx_to_irq);
+
+    if (!bus->route_intx_to_irq) {
+        return (PCIINTxRoute) { PCI_INTX_DISABLED, -1 };
+    }
+
     return bus->route_intx_to_irq(bus->irq_opaque, pin);
 }
 


Reply via email to