On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:01:40 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:37:12PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > * fix error of initializing from incorrect cpu model definition
> > use x86_cpu_def instead of def. spotted-by: Eduardo Habkost
> > * add missing env in cpu_x86_find_by_name()
> > * added cpu_x86_set_props() to make following code movement more
> > clean. suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost
> > * init name and feature to NULL, to avoid freeing uninitialized mem
> > v3:
> > * rebase on top of "x86: Implement SMEP and SMAP"
> > ---
> > target-i386/cpu.c | 199
> > +++++++++++----------------------------------------- 1 files changed, 42
> > insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
> > index 9b3cffd..22a1ded 100644
> > --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
> > @@ -221,25 +221,6 @@ static bool lookup_feature(uint32_t *pval, const
> > char *s, const char *e, return found;
> > }
> >
> > -static void add_flagname_to_bitmaps(const char *flagname, uint32_t
> > *features,
> > - uint32_t *ext_features,
> > - uint32_t *ext2_features,
> > - uint32_t *ext3_features,
> > - uint32_t *kvm_features,
> > - uint32_t *svm_features,
> > - uint32_t *cpuid_7_0_ebx_features)
> > -{
> > - if (!lookup_feature(features, flagname, NULL, feature_name) &&
> > - !lookup_feature(ext_features, flagname, NULL, ext_feature_name)
> > &&
> > - !lookup_feature(ext2_features, flagname, NULL,
> > ext2_feature_name) &&
> > - !lookup_feature(ext3_features, flagname, NULL,
> > ext3_feature_name) &&
> > - !lookup_feature(kvm_features, flagname, NULL, kvm_feature_name)
> > &&
> > - !lookup_feature(svm_features, flagname, NULL, svm_feature_name)
> > &&
> > - !lookup_feature(cpuid_7_0_ebx_features, flagname, NULL,
> > - cpuid_7_0_ebx_feature_name))
> > - fprintf(stderr, "CPU feature %s not found\n", flagname);
> > -}
> > -
> > typedef struct x86_def_t {
> > struct x86_def_t *next;
> > const char *name;
> > @@ -847,7 +828,9 @@ static void x86_cpuid_get_feature(Object *obj,
> > Visitor *v, void *opaque, !is_feature_set(name, env->cpuid_ext2_features,
> > ext2_feature_name) && !is_feature_set(name, env->cpuid_ext3_features,
> > ext3_feature_name) && !is_feature_set(name, env->cpuid_kvm_features,
> > kvm_feature_name) &&
> > - !is_feature_set(name, env->cpuid_svm_features, svm_feature_name))
> > {
> > + !is_feature_set(name, env->cpuid_svm_features, svm_feature_name)
> > &&
> > + !is_feature_set(name, env->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features,
> > + cpuid_7_0_ebx_feature_name)) {
>
> If you ever need to respin this series, it would be nice to do this at
> patch 07/23 instead.
>
> > value = false;
> > }
> >
> [...]
> > @@ -2208,6 +2092,7 @@ static void x86_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> > x86_register_cpuid_properties(obj, ext3_feature_name);
> > x86_register_cpuid_properties(obj, kvm_feature_name);
> > x86_register_cpuid_properties(obj, svm_feature_name);
> > + x86_register_cpuid_properties(obj, cpuid_7_0_ebx_feature_name);
>
> This could go to patch 07/23 as well.
Thanks,
I'll move it there and queue for next respin.
>
> It's not a problem to keep it here, however, because the new properties
> don't get actually used until this patch is applied.
>
> >
> > env->cpuid_apic_id = env->cpu_index;
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.1
> >
>
