Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> writes: > On 09/13/2012 09:27 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> If there was a better/equivalent solution that didn't depend on qemu-ga, >> I'd be all for it. But there isn't AFAICT. > > Perhaps there is. We fixed the problem for Linux by adding kvmclock and > backporting it to distros that users are most likely to use. Windows > fixed the problem by adding their own pv clock interface. So we need to > implement that, then focus on tick catchup for Windows XP and other > guests with no pv interface (*BSD, etc.)
Tick catchup simply isn't going to work. That's the whole point of the thread. > > Those older guests are also less likely to have a qemu-ga port or > administrator motivation to install it. That's a strange assertion to make. FWIW, the issue with hibernation was reported to me with a combination of WinXP and Windows 7 guests, in this case, it's a totally new deployment. Adding qemu-ga is totally reasonable. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
