On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:52:35PM +0300, Orit Wasserman wrote: > >> + for (e = res; e != NULL; e = e->ai_next) { > >> + sock = inet_connect_addr(e, block, in_progress, errp); > >> + if (in_progress && *in_progress) { > >> + return sock; > > > > Doesn't this leak res? > Actually it doesn't after patch 3 wait_for_connect is the one freeing res. > is it OK to leave it as is ? > > Orit
We can't avoid breaking bisect sometimes but let's not do this intentionally. -- MST